Reflection blog:
I like my topic because it is about both the past and our current life. My audience is who shares the same interest with me. I like to discuss with people like this. I designed my webtext in accordance with my own taste. Some of my audiences think the page is too boring to fit my topic, fashion. Well, we have our own concept of fashion now. Fortunately, I am talking about the general fashion and its relationship with the history of feminism. Therefore the differences between our understandings of modern fashion will not affect the content of my webtext. My organization is a little confusing. I will make it better in my 1500 words draft. Besides, I do not think I have done enough research for my project, which I will develop in my next steps. I will quote and paraphrase more of other experts’ works because I think their words are more powerful and authoritative than mine. I will make my final work more reliable and convincing. However, the final purpose of my project is to inform my audience how fashion reflects feminism. As a result, my project will provide a lot of information about fashion and feminism, which requires a lot of research too. My resources so far have some negative points and some positive points as well as some neutral points. In my future research, there must be lots of information. I will carefully choose helpful ones that can improve my text. I will also correct my language problems. So far, I have my thesis, my whole structure, my main points and my conclusion. My text is going well following my plan. So I will keep working on it and my podcast as well. I hope my audience and my instructor can offer me more advices on it.
Podcast Respond:
The subject of this podcast is the e-books in colleges. The audience is people who concern about collage education. And the purpose of this podcast is to argue about whether e-books or physical books are more beneficial. The speaker build her ethos through the interviews on students and instructors and logos through the comparison of e-books and physical books. The pathos of this podcast is whether for or against e-books in college. The differences between the speakers are some of them considered this issue from economical points and some of them thought from the benefits for study. Their tone is casual because they are casual interviews.
1 comment:
I think you are very organized with your topic, and that you are on the right track as far as the future of your project.
In the podcast, pathos was also realized through the enthusiasm in the students' voices when they spoke about the eBooks. Keep that in mind for your own podcast.
Post a Comment